<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The SpiderGroup Blog &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spidergroup.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Revival of Hosted Desktop</title>
		<link>http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/2010/04/the-revival-of-hosted-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/2010/04/the-revival-of-hosted-desktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SpiderGroup Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosted Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software as a service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terminal Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The technology and the principal of ‘Hosted Desktops’ has actually been around for decades under different guises such as Citrix and Microsoft Terminal Services. As early as the 1960s many large companies invested in centralised mainframe servers which could be connected to by many dumb terminals (very cheap low powered computers). Although these super-powered mainframes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The technology and the principal of ‘Hosted Desktops’ has actually been around for decades under different guises such as Citrix and Microsoft Terminal Services. As early as the 1960s many large companies invested in centralised mainframe servers which could be connected to by many dumb terminals (very cheap low powered computers). Although these super-powered mainframes were extremely expensive, they could power tens if not hundreds of terminals, which was fantastically cost effective with the economies of scale and it could all be centrally managed and secured. Up until the late 1980s this WAS the way to do computing and IBM was the standard bearer with over 90% market share. Personal Computers had been around since the late seventies but they were big, extremely expensive and not particularly reliable&#8230; so why did it all change?&#8230;</p>
<p>As technology improved, computer components became smaller, lighter, faster and cheaper, the PC became affordable and transportable, with a recorded 150 million Personal Computers world-wide by 1993. Before long there was one in every home and they quickly became recreational for learning and gaming. The consequence of this however is that they left ‘connectivity’ behind, the PCs could run their own software with pretty interfaces at top performance, better than what the mainframe could pump through to the ‘dumb terminals’. Mainframes were costly and bulky, there was no chance of having one of these at home or even in a small business so PCs were the new answer to business computing. As well as personal computers, the software industry rocketed, every computer needed the latest software and consequently the demand for IT support went through the roof. These were exciting times, by the end of 80s businesses and consumers could buy PCs running window, portable Laptops and Apple Macs and by the late 90s the internet boomed, giving us dial-up access to email and yahoo. There was new technology for business and new business in technology, everybody had more choice, was more mobile and more productive, exciting times indeed, but they were also very expensive times and had we lost something along the way?&#8230;</p>
<p>As a business owner I liked the centralised server, knowing that all the processing was taking place on these powerful mainframes, that all the business information was safe and secure on those servers and not sitting on laptops and home computers all over the world. These centralised servers were expensive but the maintenance costs were predictable, the ‘dumb terminals’ were reliable, didn’t need any setup or maintenance and they lasted forever because all the processing happened on the server. As a business owner my IT was a utility that serviced my business, I could have experts looking after the server and the rest was simple administration&#8230;</p>
<p>Over the last decade we have seen immense advancements in internet technology, broadband is more prevalent, faster and more flexible than ever before. With cable, ADSL, Public Wireless and 3G we’re always connected, at speeds that are more than capable of delivering high performance connectivity to centralised servers half way across the world. So has this development had an impact on all these problems we’ve seen with the emergence of personal (de-centralised) computing?&#8230;</p>
<p>The answer is yes, in at least two ways. The emergence of broadband has had technology innovators clambering over themselves to take the onus away from software and information running on the PC. Probably the most obvious development is web based software, sometimes described as Software as a Service or Cloud Computing. The aim here is to drive the software from centralised web servers, delivering it securely over the internet to users via a simple web browser. This fantastic way of delivering applications is not without its drawbacks, not least because it is an entirely different way of working than what most people are used to. However I’m not going in to that here, I’m more interested in the other development which is the ‘Hosted Desktop’. Now this technology is not new as I mentioned in the opening paragraph, but where previously it was a nice to have alternative to VPN when you were out the office and a handy administrative tool for an IT professional, now it can be the basis of your entire IT Infrastructure – If you want a picture painted based on a real life scenario check out my other post: The business case for Hosted Desktop.</p>
<p>There are many reasons to opt for a hosted Desktop architecture which I’ll cover in more detail in my next post but for a taster here’s a preview:</p>
<p>1.) Save money because there is no need for<br />
     a. Onsite servers<br />
     b. IT Support contracts<br />
     c. Redundant hardware<br />
     d. Backup systems<br />
     e. Anti-virus<br />
2.) Monthly licensing for all your IT<br />
3.) Scalable per/user pricing<br />
4.) Predictable budgeting for your business IT and support<br />
5.) Increased security on your data<br />
6.) In-build Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery</p>
<p>For more information on the Hosted Desktop services SpiderGroup provide take a look at our website on:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spidergroup.com/our-offerings/access-anywhere.html" target="_self">Hosted Desktop &#8211; Access your Office Anywhere</a></p>
<img src="http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=211&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/2010/04/the-revival-of-hosted-desktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPv6 &#8211; yes it is actually coming and Google are ready.</title>
		<link>http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/2009/04/ipv6-yes-it-is-actually-coming-and-google-are-ready/</link>
		<comments>http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/2009/04/ipv6-yes-it-is-actually-coming-and-google-are-ready/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SpiderGroup Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipv4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Google performed a song and dance about IPv6, whilst the rest of the IT industry remains generally unfazed&#8230; Uptake of IPv6 is low, despite predictions that IPv4 numbers will become used up in as little as two years. A recent survey by the Internet Society found that many within a small sample of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Google performed a song and dance about IPv6, whilst the rest of the IT industry remains generally unfazed&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-160"></span><strong></strong></p>
<p>Uptake of IPv6 is low, despite predictions that IPv4 numbers will become used up in as little as two years. A recent survey by the Internet Society found that many within a small sample of internet industry heavy hitters reckoned IPv6 uptake was being driven more by fashion than a strong business case.</p>
<div id="article-mpu-container">
<div id="ad-mpu1-spot" class="ad-now" style="width: auto; height: auto;">
<div id="ad-mpu1">That&#8217;s far from a universal view, with Google amongst the strongest proponents of early adoption of the next generation internet technology.</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>A team of Google engineers has worked on an IPv6 transition project on a part-time basis for about 18 months. The work means that the majority of the search engine giant&#8217;s applications and services have supported IPv6 since January. Google Maps IPv6 support was added last month.</p>
<p>&#8220;We can provide all Google services over IPv6,&#8221; Google network engineer Lorenzo Colitti said during a panel discussion at a meeting of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) last week.</p>
<p>Google engineers took IPv6 from the development of network architecture blueprints and software engineering work, through a trial phase, until Google made IPv6-based services publicly available. The project used 20 per cent of a team of Google engineers&#8217; time between July 2007 until its completion in January 2009.</p>
<p>Putting together a pilot IPv6 network &#8220;was not expensive&#8221; nor particularly difficult, according to Colitti, who advised organisations to roll out next-generation IPv6 networks in stages. Colitti said that moving to IPv6 reduces the infrastructure and support costs associated with piece-meal upgrades to existing IPv4 systems, such as the addition of additional layers of Network Address Translator kit. NAT equipment allows multiple internet-connected devices to present the same IP address.</p>
<p><strong>Chicken and Egg</strong></p>
<p>Google recently hosted a conference for IPv6 implementers, shortly after the ad aggregator published a manifesto on why IPv6 was a significant technology.</p>
<blockquote><p>By expanding the number of IP addresses &#8211; enough for three billion addresses for every person on the planet &#8211; IPv6 will clear the way for the next generation of VoIP, video conferencing, mobile applications, &#8220;smart&#8221; appliances (Internet-enabled heating systems, cars, refrigerators, and other devices) and other novel applications.In a <a href="http://www.rti.org/pubs/IPv6_cost-benefit.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> prepared for the National Institute of Standards &amp; Technology in 2005, RTI International estimated annual benefits in excess of $10 billion.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, IPv6 presents a classic chicken-and-egg problem. The benefits of any one network operator, device vendor, application and content provider, or Internet user adopting IPv6 are limited if there is not a critical mass of other adopters. As a result, adoption lags.</p></blockquote>
<p>Despite this enthusiasm (from Google at least) only a minority of organisations, admittedly very significant players including the US federal government, engineering services firm Bechtel, UK academic network JANET and err&#8230; <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/blog/146" target="_blank">The Pirate Bay</a>, have embraced the next-generation Internet protocol.</p>
<p>Original Article Source: <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/03/ipv6_analysis/" target="_blank">The Register</a></p>
<img src="http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=160&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spidergroup.com/blog/2009/04/ipv6-yes-it-is-actually-coming-and-google-are-ready/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
